AN EXPERIENCE REPORT

 

ULTRAPORTABLE NEGATIVE PRESSURE THERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF POSTMASTECTOMY WOUND DEHISCENCE FOLLOWING RADIOTHERAPY: AN EXPERIENCE REPORT

 

TERAPIA DE PRESIÓN NEGATIVA ULTRAPORTÁTIL PARA EL MANEJO DE LA DEHISCENCIA DE HERIDAS POSTMASTECTOMÍA TRAS RADIOTERAPIA: INFORME DE EXPERIENCIA

 

TERAPIA POR PRESSÃO NEGATIVA ULTRAPORTÁTIL NO MANEJO DE DEISCÊNCIA DE FERIDA PÓS-MASTECTOMIA APÓS RADIOTERAPIA: RELATO DE EXPERIÊNCIA

 

https://doi.org/10.31011/reaid-2025-v.99-n.3-art.2585

 

1Giovani Basso da Silva

2Christian Sauer Necher

3Paola Maros Heinen
4Raquel Martins Bonfim

5Eliane Goldberg Rabin

6João Gabriel Toledo Medeiros

 

1 Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA). Brazil. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5421-4034 

2 Anelo Surgical. Brazil. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1180-1279

3 Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA). Brazil.  Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1400-5913

4 Anelo Surgical. Brazil. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7991-8804

5 Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA). Brazil. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1450-2012

6Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA). Brazil. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2789-9189

 

Submission: 30-05-2025

Approval: 14-07-2025

 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Oncology patients who undergo mastectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy are at increased risk for wound healing complications, including dehiscence, infection, and tissue necrosis. Ultraportable Negative Pressure Therapy (NPT) has emerged as a promising adjunctive intervention to promote wound healing, manage exudate, and prevent local complications. Objective: To report the clinical experience of using ultraportable Negative Pressure Therapy (PICO 7®) in the management of surgical wound dehiscence following mastectomy in a cancer patient who had received adjuvant radiotherapy. Methods: This is a descriptive study presented as an experience report, conducted at a hospital in southern Brazil. The case involves a 31-year-old female patient who developed wound dehiscence following mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. After the failure of conventional therapies, the PICO 7® device was implemented. Clinical progression, wound characteristics, and therapeutic response were evaluated. Results: The use of ultraportable NPT resulted in rapid granulation tissue formation, effective exudate management, and approximation of wound edges. Progressive wound healing was observed, accompanied by a reduction in infectious complications and early discharge from the wound care outpatient clinic. Conclusion: Ultraportable Negative Pressure Therapy proved to be an innovative, safe, and cost-effective intervention for the management of post-mastectomy wound dehiscence in patients who have undergone radiotherapy. Further research is required to validate its effectiveness across diverse oncological contexts.

Keywords: Negative Pressure Therapy; Wound Healing; Mastectomy; Radiotherapy; Breast Oncology.

 

RESUMEN

Introducción: Los pacientes oncológicos sometidos a mastectomía y radioterapia adyuvante presentan un alto riesgo de complicaciones en la cicatrización, como dehiscencia, infección y necrosis. La Terapia de Presión Negativa (TPN) ultraportátil surge como una estrategia adyuvante eficaz para promover la cicatrización, controlar el exudado y prevenir complicaciones locales. Objetivo: Relatar la experiencia del uso de la Terapia de Presión Negativa ultraportátil (PICO 7®) en el tratamiento de la dehiscencia de herida operatoria posterior a mastectomía en una paciente oncológica sometida a radioterapia. Métodos: Se trata de un estudio descriptivo del tipo relato de experiencia, realizado en una institución hospitalaria del sur de Brasil. Paciente de 31 años, con dehiscencia de herida posterior a mastectomía y radioterapia, fue tratada con el dispositivo PICO 7® tras el fracaso de terapias convencionales. Se evaluaron la evolución clínica, las características de la lesión y la respuesta a la terapia. Resultados: La aplicación de la TPN ultraportátil favoreció la rápida formación de tejido de granulación, el control eficaz del exudado y la aproximación de los bordes de la herida. Se observó una cicatrización progresiva, reducción de complicaciones infecciosas y alta precoz del ambulatorio de heridas. Conclusión: La Terapia de Presión Negativa ultraportátil demostró ser una tecnología innovadora, segura y costo-efectiva para el manejo de dehiscencias posteriores a mastectomía en pacientes sometidas a radioterapia. Se destaca la necesidad de más estudios para validar su eficacia en diferentes escenarios oncológicos.

Palabras clave: Terapia de Presión Negativa; Cicatrización de Heridas; Mastectomía; Radioterapia; Oncología Mamaria.

 

RESUMO

Introdução: Pacientes oncológicos submetidos a mastectomia e radioterapia adjuvante apresentam elevado risco de complicações na cicatrização, como deiscência, infecção e necrose. A Terapia por Pressão Negativa (TPN) ultraportátil surge como estratégia adjuvante eficaz na promoção da cicatrização, controle do exsudato e prevenção de complicações locais. Objetivo: Relatar a experiência do uso da Terapia por Pressão Negativa ultraportátil (PICO 7®) no tratamento de deiscência de ferida operatória após mastectomia em paciente oncológica submetida à radioterapia. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo descritivo do tipo relato de experiência, realizado em uma instituição hospitalar do sul do Brasil. Paciente de 31 anos, com deiscência de ferida pós-mastectomia e radioterapia, foi tratada com o dispositivo PICO 7® após insucesso de terapias convencionais. Foram avaliados evolução clínica, características da lesão e resposta à terapêutica. Resultados: A aplicação da TPN ultraportátil favoreceu rápida formação de tecido de granulação, controle eficaz do exsudato e aproximação das bordas da ferida. Observou-se cicatrização progressiva, redução de intercorrências infecciosas e alta precoce do ambulatório de feridas. Conclusão: A Terapia por Pressão Negativa ultraportátil demonstrou ser uma tecnologia inovadora, segura e custo-efetiva para o manejo de deiscências pós-mastectomia em pacientes submetidas à radioterapia. Destaca-se a necessidade de mais estudos para validar sua eficácia em diferentes cenários oncológicos.

Palavras-chave: Terapia por Pressão Negativa; Cicatrização de Feridas; Mastectomia; Radioterapia; Oncologia Mamária.    

               
INTRODUCTION

Wound management in oncology patients poses significant challenges due to the complexity of lesions and the adverse effects of adjuvant therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which can impair the healing process. Complications including surgical dehiscence, infection, and tissue necrosis are common following procedures such as mastectomy, negatively impacting patients' quality of life and contributing to increased healthcare costs¹.

Negative Pressure Therapy (NPT) has emerged as a promising adjunctive technology for the management of complex wounds. Through the application of controlled subatmospheric pressure to the wound bed, NPT facilitates granulation tissue formation, reduces edema, manages exudate, and establishes an optimal environment for tissue repair. In the context of breast oncology, NPT has been investigated as a postoperative support strategy, particularly in breast reconstruction procedures². Ultraportable systems, such as Smith & Nephew’s PICO 7®, have demonstrated high effectiveness by delivering the therapeutic benefits of NPT in a practical and patient-friendly manner. By promoting wound healing and improving patient comfort, these devices significantly enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.

Negative Pressure Therapy has been shown to reduce local complications, such as skin flap necrosis and infections, in reconstructive surgeries involving implants. One study demonstrated that the prophylactic use of NPT in patients undergoing breast reconstruction with prosthetic implants was associated with lower rates of necrosis and overall postoperative complications³.

The use of NPT has also yielded positive outcomes in oncologic surgeries of the head and neck—anatomically complex regions with a heightened risk of infection. One study demonstrated that the application of NPT to primary surgical incisions in patients undergoing cervical procedures significantly reduced local complication rates and was found to be both well tolerated and safe⁴.

In gynecologic oncology, NPT has been investigated as an alternative strategy for preventing surgical site infections in patients undergoing laparotomies. When applied to closed incisions, NPT has been associated with a significant reduction in infection rates, reinforcing its potential role as a prophylactic measure in major abdominal procedures⁵.

Moreover, the benefits of NPT in oncologic breast surgeries include a reduction in complications such as seroma, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. These findings suggest that NPT should be considered for high-risk patients, including those undergoing bilateral mastectomy or presenting with significant clinical comorbidities⁶.

In light of these considerations, the present experience report aims to demonstrate that Negative Pressure Therapy, such as Smith & Nephew’s PICO 7®, represents an innovative and cost-effective technology capable of transforming wound management, particularly in cases of post-mastectomy dehiscence. By promoting faster and more effective healing, reducing complications, and enhancing patients’ quality of life, NPT emerges as an essential tool in clinical practice, especially within hospital settings. This study also seeks to encourage further research to explore the potential applications of this technology across a range of oncological contexts.

 

METHODOLOGY

Study Type

 

            This exploratory descriptive study is presented as an experience report on the use of ultraportable Negative Pressure Therapy (Smith & Nephew PICO 7®) in the healing of post-mastectomy surgical wound dehiscence following radiotherapy.

 

Study Setting

            The study was conducted at a hospital in southern Brazil, which serves as a reference center for oncologic reconstructive plastic surgery procedures.

 

Ethical Considerations

            Since this is an experience report, the study did not require approval from a Research Ethics Committee. However, verbal consent was obtained from the patient for the disclosure of data and images related to the proposed treatment.

 

Type of Therapy Used

            In this report, the Negative Pressure Therapy (NPT) device PICO 7, manufactured by Smith & Nephew, was utilized. This device is characterized by its ultraportable design and a 10 x 20 cm dressing. The system comprises a pressure-generating unit and an integrated sterile dressing. The PICO 7 delivers a continuous negative pressure of 80 mmHg (nominal value) directly to the wound surface, thereby creating an optimal environment for healing.

Exudate management is achieved through a combined system involving absorption by the dressing and moisture evaporation through its semi-permeable outer layer. Designed for patients with low to moderately exudating wounds, the PICO 7 promotes accelerated granulation tissue formation and reduces the risk of infection. It is particularly well-suited for clinical contexts requiring outpatient or home-based wound care.

 

RESULTS

This experience report outlines the patient’s clinical history, wound characteristics, the therapeutic approach implemented, and the clinical progression observed during the use of the PICO 7 device.

 

Patient and Wound Clinical History

A 31-year-old female patient with a prior history of breast cancer underwent a right mastectomy with breast implant placement on November 1, 2024. She subsequently initiated adjuvant radiotherapy on November 27, 2024, completing 15 conventional sessions followed by 5 boost sessions, with the treatment concluding on December 24, 2024.

At the conclusion of the radiotherapy protocol, the patient developed grade IV radiodermatitis, which progressed to an ulcerated lesion in the right breast region. She began follow-up care with a specialized wound care team at an outpatient clinic, initially receiving dressings with Aquacel® in combination with Safgel®. Despite these interventions, the wound condition progressively deteriorated, leading to complete surgical wound dehiscence and exposure of the breast implant.

On February 18, 2025, the patient began follow-up with a specialist nurse, who performed a detailed wound assessment and recommended the initiation of Negative Pressure Therapy. Following approval by the health insurance provider and coordination of hospital logistics, the PICO 7 device was applied on March 17, 2025. At that time, debridement of nonviable tissue was performed, followed by primary intention approximation of the wound edges and application of the negative pressure system.

The first dressing change was performed on March 20, 2025, to assess the wound bed. The sutures were maintained for 15 days, while the PICO 7 dressing remained in place, ensuring an optimal environment for healing through effective exudate control and a reduced risk of infection.

 

Figure 1 - Wound on December 24, 2024.

Source: Research Data.

During the patient's follow-up and the final therapeutic phase using the PICO 7 device, dressing changes and periodic reassessments were conducted by the multidisciplinary team involved in her care. At each stage, clinical management was adapted based on the wound’s progression. Table 1 presents a summary of the interventions performed throughout the course of treatment.

 

Table 1 - Summary of Interventions Performed Throughout the Treatment

Period

Therapy Used

Dressing Change Frequency

Remarks

12/24/2024 to 02/18/2025

Aquacel + Safgel

Every 72 hours

Initial treatment at the wound care outpatient clinic

02/18/2025 to 03/17/2025

Biatain Silicone Ag

Every 96 hours

Chosen for comfort and exudate management

03/17/2025 to 03/24/2025

Negative Pressure Therapy with PICO 7

Single change during the period

Applied after debridement and suturing

03/24/2025 to 03/31/2025

Gauze for suture protection

As needed

Final healing phase

Source: Research Data.

 

            Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 illustrate the clinical progression of the wound throughout the treatment, highlighting the various stages of the healing process. The photographs are presented in chronological order based on the date of each record, providing a sequential and comparative view of the progress achieved with the implemented therapeutic approach.

 

Figure 2 - Wound on February 1, 2025.

Source: Research Data.

Figure 3 - Wound on February 18, 2025.

Source: Research Data.

 

Figure 4: Wound on March 17, 2025, prior to NPT application.

Source: Research Data.

 

Figure 5 - Wound on March 17, 2025, after NPT application.

Source: Research Data.

 

Figure 6: Wound on March 25, 2025, after NPT removal.

Source: Research Data.

Figure 7 - Wound on April 9, 2025, after completion of treatment.

Source: Research Data.

 

DISCUSSION

This experience report reinforces the role of Negative Pressure Therapy (NPT) in the management of complex wounds, particularly among oncology patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy. The use of the ultraportable PICO 7® device was found to facilitate wound healing by ensuring effective exudate control and promoting approximation of wound edges—outcomes that align with findings reported in recent literature.

A study demonstrated⁸ that the use of NPT in prosthetic breast reconstructions significantly reduced rates of flap necrosis and infectious complications, suggesting that the subatmospheric environment enhances vascularization and reduces tension on newly reconstructed tissues. These benefits were also observed in the present report, which documented rapid granulation tissue formation and the absence of new infectious complications.

Furthermore, a systematic review and meta-analysis⁹ demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of seroma, hematoma, and wound dehiscence in oncologic breast surgeries when prophylactic NPT was applied to closed incisions. These findings further support the indication of this method for high-risk patients, such as those who have undergone radiotherapy, as illustrated by the case presented in this report.

Another noteworthy aspect was the reduced need for frequent dressing changes, underscoring the capacity of ultraportable NPT to maintain an optimal moist environment for healing while minimizing wound manipulation and patient discomfort¹⁰.

Despite the favorable outcomes, it is important to recognize that the benefits of NPT are not universally observed. One reviewed study reported no statistically significant differences in complication rates among patients undergoing mastectomy with flap fixation, suggesting that the effectiveness of NPT may vary depending on the type of surgery and the application protocol utilized¹¹. Therefore, the positive results described in this report may be attributed, in part, to appropriate patient selection and the careful implementation of the technology.

Moreover, the use of NPT in outpatient and home care settings, as demonstrated in this case, has been reported as both safe and effective. This supports its application in high-risk cervical incisions and reinforces the safety and feasibility of the method beyond the traditional hospital environment¹².

Another important aspect is the cost-effectiveness of NPT. The prophylactic use of NPT in oncologic abdominal surgeries has been associated with a significant reduction in surgical site infection rates, leading to decreased hospital costs, shorter lengths of stay, and reduced need for antibiotic therapy¹³. In the present case, the favorable clinical progression facilitated early discharge from the specialized outpatient clinic and minimized the need for additional surgical interventions.

Therefore, the findings presented in this report are consistent with the current literature, indicating that ultraportable Negative Pressure Therapy is a safe, effective, and cost-efficient approach for managing post-mastectomy wound dehiscence in patients who have undergone radiotherapy.

 

Study Limitations

Since this is an experience report, the observations described are based on a single patient, which limits the generalizability of the results. Additionally, the absence of a control group precludes direct comparisons with other therapeutic modalities. Further studies employing robust methodological designs and larger sample sizes are necessary to validate these findings and establish more precise clinical guidelines.

 

Contributions to the Health Field

            The implementation of NPT, particularly through ultraportable devices such as the PICO 7®, represents a significant innovation in the management of complex wounds in oncology patients. Its applicability in outpatient and home care settings broadens access to advanced therapeutic options, thereby promoting equity in care. Furthermore, the reduction in complications and the acceleration of the healing process may contribute to decreased healthcare costs and improved clinical outcomes.

 

CONCLUSIONS

            The reported experience highlights NPT as an effective tool in the management of post-mastectomy wound dehiscence in patients who have undergone radiotherapy. The use of the PICO 7® device provided an optimal environment for healing, ensuring adequate exudate control and infection prevention. Despite the inherent limitations of the study, the outcomes observed are promising and underscore the need for further research to support the incorporation of NPT as a standard practice in the treatment of complex oncologic wounds.

 

REFERENCES

1)      Wang YJ, Yao XF, Lin YS, Wang JY, Chang CC. Oncologic feasibility for negative pressure wound therapy application in surgical wounds: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2022 Mar;19(3):573-82. doi:10.1111/iwj.13654.

 

2)      Faisal M, Berend PD, Seemann R, et al. Impact of Previous Irradiation on Wound Healing after Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(10):2482. doi:10.3390/cancers13102482​.

 

3)      Esen E, et al. The use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy on high-risk breast cancer mastectomy patients. Asian J Surg. 2024;S1015-9584(24)01706-8. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.07.333

 

4)      Pieszko K, Pieszko K, Wichtowski M, Cieśla S, Ławnicka A, Jamont R, Boyd JB, Murawa D. A Randomized Study Comparing Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Standard Care in Immediate Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jun 1;151(6):1123-33. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010110. Epub 2022 Dec 26. PMID: 36728789.

 

5)      Onderková A, Butler PEM, Kalavrezos N. The efficacy of negative-pressure wound therapy for head and neck wounds: A systematic review and update. Head Neck. 2023 Dec;45(12):3168-79. doi: 10.1002/hed.27547. Epub 2023 Oct 20. PMID: 37860929.

 

6)      Leitao MM Jr, Zhou QC, Schiavone MB, Cowan RA, Smith ES, Iasonos A, Veith M, Rafizadeh M, Curran K, Ramesh B, Chang K, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Brown AK, Cosin JA, Abu-Rustum NR, Martino MA, Mueller JJ, Long Roche K, Jewell EL, Broach V, Lambrou NC, Diaz JP, Zivanovic O. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Laparotomy for Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb 1;137(2):334-41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004243. PMID: 33416292; PMCID: PMC7856105.

 

7)      Doval AF, Chegireddy V, Beal L, Arroyo-Alonso C, Zavlin D, Spiegel AJ, Ellsworth WA. Efficacy of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Abdominal Donor Site After Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. Wounds. 2021 Apr;33(4):81-5. PMID: 33872200.

 

8)      Chicco M, Huang TC, Cheng HT. Negative-pressure wound therapy in the prevention and management of complications from prosthetic breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Oct;87(4):478–83. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002722.

 

9)      Cagney D, Simmons L, O’Leary DP, et al. The efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for closed incisions in breast surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2020 May;44(5):1526–37. doi:10.1007/s00268-019-05335-x.

 

10)  Iqbal FM, Reid JP, Vidya R. Oncoplastic breast surgery: the role of negative pressure wound therapy. J Wound Care. 2020 Dec;29(12):777–80. doi:10.12968/jowc.2020.29.12.777.

 

11)  De Rooij L, van Kuijk SMJ, van Haaren ERM, et al. Negative pressure wound therapy does not decrease postoperative wound complications in patients undergoing mastectomy and flap fixation. Sci Rep. 2021 May 5;11(1):9620. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89036-3.

 

12)  O’Malley QF, Hom DB, Mantravadi AV, Liu JC, Ji B, et al. The use of negative pressure wound therapy in the primary setting for high-risk head and neck surgery. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020 Jul-Aug;41(4):102470. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102470.

 

13) Chambers LM, Morton M, Lampert E, et al. Use of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure therapy is associated with reduced surgical site infections in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):731.e1–731.e9. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.011.

 

Funding and Acknowledgments:

Nothing to declare.

 

Declaration of Conflict of Interest

Nothing to declare.

 

Author Contributions:

 

 1. Substantially contributed to the conception and/or planning of the study: Giovani Basso da Silva, Christian Sauer Necher, Paola Maros Heinen, Raquel Martins Bonfim, Eliane Goldberg Rabin, João Gabriel Toledo Medeiros.

 

2. Data collection, analysis, and/or interpretation: Giovani Basso da Silva, Christian Sauer Necher, Paola Maros Heinen, Raquel Martins Bonfim, Eliane Goldberg Rabin, João Gabriel Toledo Medeiros.

 

3. Written and/or critically reviewed and approved the final version of the published work: Giovani Basso da Silva, Christian Sauer Necher, Paola Maros Heinen, Raquel Martins Bonfim, Eliane Goldberg Rabin, João Gabriel Toledo Medeiros.

 

Scientific Editor: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7316-2519

 

Rev Enferm Atual In Derme 2025;99(3): e025110                

 Atribuição CCBY