MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01D81D9E.465FEE80" Este documento é uma Página da Web de Arquivo Único, também conhecido como Arquivo Web. Se você estiver lendo essa mensagem, o seu navegador ou editor não oferece suporte ao Arquivo Web. Baixe um navegador que ofereça suporte ao Arquivo Web. ------=_NextPart_01D81D9E.465FEE80 Content-Location: file:///C:/B08A3CEE/file9582.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1252"
SYSTEMATIZATION OF NURSING CARE TO A PATIENT IN PREMATURE LABOR
SISTEMATIZACIÓN DE LA ASISTENCIA DE ENFERMERÍA A LA PACIENTE EN PARTO
PREMATURO
SISTEMATIZAÇÃO DA ASSISTÊNCIA DE ENFERMAGEM A UMA PACIEN=
TE
EM TRABALHO DE PARTO PREMATURO
Vitória Costa Oliveira1
Isabelle e Silva Sousa2
Raphaella Castro Jansen3
Maria Rayssa do Nascimento Nogueira=
4
Iorana Candido da Silva5
Leidiane Minervina Moraes de
Sabino6
1Acadêmica de Enfermagem na Universidade da Integração Internacional =
da
Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira, Redenção, Brasil.
ORCID: https://orc=
id.org/0000-0001-7341-8596
2Acadêmica de Enfermagem na Universidade da Integração Internacional =
da
Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira, Redenção, Brasil.
ORCID: https://orc=
id.org/0000-0003-3387-6722
3Acadêmica de Enfermagem na Universidade da Integração Internacional =
da
Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira, Redenção, Brasil.
ORCID: https://orc=
id.org/0000-0002-4032-5825
4Acadêmica de Enfermagem na Universidade da Integração Internacional =
da
Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira, Redenção, Brasil.
ORCID: https://orc=
id.org/0000-0003-0355-5901
5Acadêmica de Enfermagem na Universidade da Integração Internacional =
da
Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira, Redenção, Brasil.
ORCID: https://orc=
id.org/0000-0003-0815-1703
6Doutora em Enfermagem pela Universidade Federal do Ceará e docente do
curso de Enfermagem na Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia
Afro-Brasileira, Redenção, Brasil.
ORCID: https://orc=
id.org/0000-0003-2938-870X
Autor correspondente
Vitór=
ia
Costa Oliveira. Av. da Abolição, nº 3, Centro, Redenção - CE, 62790-000.
E-mail: vitoriaoliverebj@gmai=
l.com.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To report =
the
experience of elaborating the Systematization of Nursing Care (SNC) to a
patient diagnosed with Premature Labor (PL). Method: This is an
experience report, carried out in January 2020 in a tertiary hospital locat=
ed
in the State of Ceará. For data collection, the steps of the nursing process
were followed. In the first stage (nursing history), medical records, anamn=
esis
and physical examination were consulted. For the other stages of the process
(diagnoses, planning, implementation and evaluation), the NANDA-I, NIC and =
NOC
taxonomies were used, respecting ethical aspects. Results: Pregnant
woman with a gestational age of 34 weeks, hospitalized for PL, with bacteri=
al
vaginosis and urinary tract infection. Nursing diagnoses (results) were lis=
ted:
Acute pain (Analgesic administration as prescribed); Disturbed mother-fetus
binomial risk (fetal monitoring); Anxiety (Promotion of comfort and reducti=
on
of anxiety). Final considerations: The experience allowed the
improvement of clinical reasoning skills and SNC implementation.
Keywo=
rds: Obstetric Nursing; Nursing <=
span
class=3DSpellE>Process; Obstetric Labor,=
Premature.
RESUM=
O
Objet=
ivo: Relatar a experiência da
elaboração da Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem (SAE) a uma pacie=
nte
com diagnóstico de Trabalho de Parto Prematuro (TPP). Método: Trata-=
se
de um relato de experiência, realizado em janeiro de 2020 em um hospital
terciário localizado no Estado do Ceará. Para coleta dos dados seguiu-se as
etapas do processo de enfermagem. Na primeira etapa (histórico de enfermage=
m)
foi realizada consulta ao prontuário, anamnese e exame físico. Para as dema=
is
etapas do processo (diagnósticos, planejamento, implementação e avaliação),
utilizou-se as taxonomias NANDA-I, NIC e NOC, respeitando os aspectos ético=
s. Resultados:
Gestante com idade gestacional de 34 semanas, internada por TPP, com vagino=
se
bacteriana e infecção do trato urinário. Elencaram-se os diagnósticos
(resultados) de Enfermagem: Dor aguda (Administração de analgésico conforme
prescrição); Risco binômio mãe-feto perturbado (Monitorização fetal); Ansie=
dade
(Promoção de conforto e redução da ansiedade). Considerações finais:=
A
experiência permitiu o aprimoramento das habilidades de raciocínio clínico e
implementação da SAE.
Palav=
ras-chaves: Enfermagem Obstétrica; Cuida=
dos
de Enfermagem; Trabalho de Parto Prematuro.
RESUM=
EN
Objet=
ivo: Relatar la experiencia de
elaboración de la Sistematización de la Atención de Enfermería (SAE) a una
paciente diagnosticada con Trabajo de Parto Prematuro (TPP). Método:=
Se
trata de un relato de experiencia, realizado en enero de 2020 en un hospita=
l de
tercer nivel ubicado en el Estado de Ceará. Para la recolección de datos, se
siguieron los pasos del proceso de enfermería. En la primera etapa (historia de enfermería), se consultaron historias clín=
icas,
anamnesis y examen físico. Para las demás etapas del proceso (diagnóstico,
planificación, implementación y evaluación) se utilizaron las taxonomías
NANDA-I, NIC y NOC, respetando los aspectos éticos. Resultados:
Embarazada con edad gestacional de 34 semanas, hospitalizada por TPP, con
vaginosis bacteriana e infección de vías urinarias. Fueron listados los
diagnósticos de enfermería (resultados): Dolor agudo (Administración de
analgésicos según prescripción); Riesgo binomio madre-feto perturbado
(monitoreo fetal); Ansiedad (Promoción del confort y reducción de la ansied=
ad).
Consideraciones finales: La experiencia permitió la mejora de las
habilidades de razonamiento clínico y la implementación de SAE.
Palab=
ras
clave:
Enfermería Obstétrica; Proceso de Enfermería; Trabajo de Parto Prematuro.
INTRODUCTION
Pregnancy is a physiological process that normally lasts
between 37 completed weeks to 42 incomplete weeks. During this period, the
woman undergoes physical and psychological changes and may present some
complications or complications, requiring referral to specialized care for
high-risk pregnant women.(1) Among these complications, Premature
Labor (PL) or preterm delivery stands out. term, defined as a syndrome that
occurs between 22 and 37 weeks of gestation and is associated with increased
neonatal morbidity.(2)
Approximately 15 million preterm children are born world=
wide
each year.(3) In Brazil, one in four infant deaths occurs in the
first 24 hours of life, with prematurity being the cause of 70% of these
deaths.(4) Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública (ENSP/Fiocruz) carri=
ed
out a survey and found that the Brazilian prematurity rate is 11.5% of birt=
hs.
In 2017, 2.87 million births were recorded in Brazil, in which more than
330,000 babies were born before 37 weeks that year.(5)
Although the etiology of PL is not fully understood, it =
can
be associated with several risk factors, such as a history of preterm birth,
anemia, smoking, premature rupture of membranes, arterial hypertension,
transvaginal bleeding, the absence of prenatal control, inadequate prenatal
control, maternal age over 35 years, urinary tract infection (UTI),
oligohydramnios, among others.(2,6)
Therefore, it is emphasized that a maternal infection,
whatever its origin or location, decisively influences preterm birth, espec=
ially
those that affect the genital organs. It should also be noted that most pre=
term
births may be related to infections.(=
7)
In this context, due to its intrinsic relationship with
maternal and child mortality, PL is considered one of the main global conce=
rns
and a challenge for public health. Reducing this index depends on the
preparation of the health service and qualified professionals to provide
adequate prenatal care, with early identification of signs and symptoms
indicative of PL, as well as effective decision-making in emergency situations.(8)
Among the professionals who provide care to patients wit=
h PL,
nurses stand out, due to their competence to identify early signs of PL and
manage the nursing team to carry out evidence-based therapeutic approaches.
With the assistance provided, the objective is to provide care and promote
comprehensive care for the pregnant woman and the fetus, and thus contribut=
e to
the reduction of the incidence of perinatal morbidity and mortality.(9)
Considering the organization of professional Conselho
Nacional de Enfermagem (COFEN) established Resolution nº 358/2009, which
provides for the Systematization of Nursing Care (SNC) and the implementati=
on
of the Nursing Process (NP). The SNC refers to the organization of professi=
onal
performance with regard to the method, personnel and instruments, aspects t=
hat
enable the operationalization of the NP, a methodological instrument that
guides the assistance and documentation of nursing actions. Therefore, the =
SNC
and NP direct nursing care according to the patient's needs, whether in pub=
lic
or private environments, ensuring visibility and professional recognition.(10)
In this sense, the SNC is an important tool used by nurs=
es
to promote a holistic, safe and systematized patient care, as it provides
scientific, technical and human resources for the operationalization of the=
NP.
Taking into account the context above, this study aims to report the experi=
ence
of elaborating the SNC to a patient diagnosed with PL.
METHODS
This is a descriptive study, with a qualitative approach=
, of
the experience report type, based on the elaboration of the SNC for a patie=
nt
with a clinical picture of PL. It was carried out in January 2020 in a Hosp=
ital
in the State of Ceará, by nursing students, during the curricular internshi=
p of
the discipline Process of Care in Sexual and Reproductive Health of the Nur=
sing
course at the Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia
Afro-Brasileira.
For data collection and analysis, we chose to follow the
steps of the NP, which, according to COFEN Resolution nº 358/2009, consists=
of
five steps: Nursing history, which includes data collection and physical
examination; Nursing Diagnosis, formulated from the problems identified dur=
ing
the anamnesis; Nursing Planning, based on the needs observed in the previous
phase; Nursing Implementation, a stage that consists of performing the list=
ed
care; and Nursing Assessment, which is based on the analysis of the patient=
's
evolution after the assistance provided.(10)
Data collection took place with the aid of a semi-struct=
ured
instrument organized into three components, namely: 1. collection of
information from the patient's medical record, with the aim of knowing the
history of current disease, the results of laboratory tests performed and
clinical evolution; 2. anamnesis, which made it possible to identify the
current health history, possible complaints and the patient's profile; and =
the
cephalocaudal physical examination, in order to assess the functioning of t=
he
physiological systems and detect eventual alterations.
In possession of the information, the care plan was
established. The NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses taxonomies were used to define t=
he
nursing diagnoses, Classification of Nursing Interventions (NIC) for
interventions to be performed by the team and Classification of Nursing
Outcomes (NOC) for the expected results and evaluation of the assistance.(11-13)
After that, the care planning was attached to the patien=
t's
chart, so that the established care could be implemented according to the
patient's needs and the routine of the health institution. Finally, the
assessment of care was performed based on the observation of the patient's
evolution according to the care provided.
The ethical aspects present in Resolution nº 466/2012 of=
the
National Health Council were respected, as well as the conducts set out in =
the
Code of Ethics for Nursing=
Professionals.(14,15)
RESULTS
The nursing process was carried out in the present study,
starting with the nursing history stage, from the anamnesis and physical
examination and consultation of the patient's multiprofessional chart. Some
relevant aspects were highlighted during the anamnesis, such as: patient wi=
th
34 weeks of gestation; reported prematurity in a previous pregnancy and low=
adherence
to prenatal care in the current pregnancy; sought health care when experien=
cing
severe pain in the lumbar region, radiating to the abdomen and lower abdome=
n,
with PL prodomes, rhythmic contractions, signs of imminence, loss of liquid=
s,
nausea and vomiting.
According to the medical records, the vaginal examination
revealed a posterior cervix, in effacement, with an intact pouch and dilata=
tion
of 2 to 3 cm. Tocolysis was performed and corticosteroids and antibiotics w=
ere
administered. In addition, the tests performed identified UTI and Bacterial
Vaginosis, and obstetric ultrasound showed adequate fetal growth. Regarding=
the
clinical picture, the patient progressed in good general condition, however,
she complained of stabbing pain in the right and left lower quadrants of the
abdomen, which ceased with time. She reported loss of mucus plug, with no o=
ther
vaginal losses. She presented anxiety and restlessness regarding her health
condition and that of the fetus.
Thus, the Nursing Diagnoses and Nursing Planning were
established, which involves the necessary interventions and their respective
expected results, following the steps of the NP, as shown in Frame 1.
Frame
1- Systematization of Nursing Care
designed for the patient. Ceara, Brazil, 2020.
Diagnosis |
Expected
results |
Interventions
carried out |
Acute pain, related to uterine contractions, evidenced by
self-reported pain intensity and expression. |
Control
of pain and discomfort levels. |
Administration of analgesics as prescribed by a physic=
ian;
shower; emotional support; improved positioning in bed; active listening.=
|
Disturbed mother-fetus binomial
risk related to preterm labor. |
Maintenance of the health of the mother and fetus. |
Promotion of care in high-risk pregnancy; electronic f=
etal
monitoring; medication control; supervision. |
Anxiety related to labor, evidenced by a report of con=
cern
about the conditions of delivery. |
Reduction of anxiety levels, maintenance of coping and
increase in self-control and concentration in other activities. |
Comfort promotion; anxiety reduction; pain and environ=
ment
control. |
Source:
Authors.
The listed care
was based on the need to implement a holistic c=
are
plan aligned with the patient's particularities. With the implementation of
Nursing care, the patient reported being more comfortable and with less pai=
n,
she was more calm and confident about her safety and that of her baby. In
addition, guidelines were provided on breastfeeding and care for the newbor=
n.
It is noteworthy that these results were analyzed immediately after the
interventions were applied, in the Nursing Assessment phase, when the
professional investigates the evolution of the patient's clinical condition
according to the care provided.
The operationalization of the NP through the SNC provide=
d a
coordinated, holistic and humanized assistance. The experience was successf=
ul,
since the care plan developed by the academics resulted in improvements in =
the
patient's clinical condition, thus achieving the proposed objective with the
implementation of the SNC. In addition, the experience provided the academi=
cs
with the improvement of a clinical and comprehensive view of the health-dis=
ease
process, as well as experience in the construction of a cohesive and
individualized strategy to be adopted by the nursing team during the follow=
-up
of the patient.
The activity also enabled the acquisition of new knowled=
ge
and the theoretical-practical alignment of this methodology, which generates
value and scientificity to professional practice, due to the proximity of t=
he
academic to the working environment. Teamwork was also one of the improved
aspects, since the elaboration of the care plan allowed the discussion of t=
he
clinical case with other interns and with professionals from the
multidisciplinary team, which contributed to the expansion of knowledge abo=
ut
the health condition presented by the patient. patient. However, the best
benefit gained from the experience was the opportunity to closely observe t=
he
activities developed by the Nurse from the application of the NP, to later
reproduce them, especially in the face of a critical situation, such as the=
PL.
=
=
DISCUSSION
Nursing
practice is based on SNC, being guided by technical-scientific methods. This
process is configured as a work instrument whose purpose is to guide nursin=
g professionals
to perform care in a methodical, organized, planned and holistic way.(16)
The
execution of this flow provides the nursing work process with a foundation =
for
humanized care, capable of promoting numerous benefits, such as: effective
planning, implementation and evaluation of nursing actions, individualized =
care
and reduction of the hospitalization period, which provides savings of human
and material resources, in addition to generating visibility and autonomy f=
or
the class.(16)
Thus, implementing the SNC is to adopt
scientific nursing capable of directing care to the main needs of the patie=
nt,
whether the patient has a critical or stable clinical condition.(17) <=
/sup>From
this perspective, the implementation of SNC for a patient undergoing PL is =
of paramount
importance. , since this complication is one of the main gestational
complications that causes mortality in newborns.
Nurses a=
re
able to identify a PL condition, as they are able to recognize that the
presence of painful uterine contractions (1-2/10 minutes), presence of cerv=
ical
dilatation equal to or greater than 2 cm, cervical effacement of 80% or more
and a gestational age greater than or equal to 20 weeks and less than 37 we=
eks
are considered clinical signs of this gestational complication.(18, 19=
)
In addit=
ion,
the professional must know the various causes of this complication. The pat=
ient
in this study had signs of UTI, bacterial vaginosis and vaginal fluid loss.=
The
anatomical and physiological changes imposed on the urinary tract by pregna=
ncy
predispose the proliferation of bacteria, which can cause symptomatic or
asymptomatic infections. UTI is a relevant complication of the gestational
period, which can worsen both maternal and perinatal prognosis. Among the m=
ost
common complications resulting from this infection during pregnancy are
intrauterine growth restriction, low birth weight, premature rupture of
amniotic membranes, cerebral palsy, PL, perinatal death and fetal mortality.(20)
It is al=
so
noteworthy that during pregnancy the woman undergoes hormonal changes that =
lead
to an imbalance of the vaginal microbiota, favoring the appearance of signs=
and
symptoms characteristic of vaginosis, such as white, greenish or grayish
discharge, with a strong smell and a burning sensation when urinate. Like U=
TI,
vaginosis can cause complications such as premature delivery, premature rup=
ture
of membranes, low birth weight, miscarriage and neonatal death.(21)
Prematur=
e Rupture
of Membranes (PRM) is considered to be the loss of amniotic fluid prior to =
the
onset of labor, regardless of gestational age. When it occurs before the 37=
th
week of gestation, it is classified as Premature Membrane Rupture (PMR).(22)
Thus, it is observed that the UTI
and bacterial vaginosis may have contributed to the PL of the patient in th=
is
study, in addition, the association of the two conditions may have caused t=
he PMR.
Thus, it is inferred that the occurrence of PL assisted by the researchers
resulted from the relationship between several clinical complications, comm=
on
in pregnancy, but which did not receive the necessary attention due to low
adherence to prenatal care and thus culminated in a PL.
It is noteworthy that although P=
L is
not considered a pathology, it is a condition in which nurses must maintain=
a
state of alert, as this situation can cause maternal-fetal morbidity and
mortality. Therefore, nurses play an essential role, whose main objective i=
s to
develop a care plan aimed at the well-being of this bin=
omial.(23)
In view of the clinical picture presented by the patient in the prese=
nt
study, three priority diagnoses were listed: Acute pain; Risk of the distur=
bed
mother-fetus binomial; Anxiety.
It is known that labor is a
physiological process, of a subjective nature, subject to the influence of
numerous sensory stimuli and is intrinsically related to physical elements =
and
environmental factors. Among the sensory stimuli present in this process, a=
cute
pain stands out as an experience sometimes reported as inexplicable, horrib=
le
or even unbearable by parturients. Therefore, from the report of acute pain=
by
the patient in the present study, this diagnosis was based, since its defin=
ing
characteristics are: change in blood pressure, change in heart rate, change=
s in
uterine dynamics and verbal reports of pain. (24, 25)
Preterm newborns (PN) are subjec=
t to
the most varied neonatal complications due to their premature exposure to an
environment to which they were not prepared to interact.(26) Amo=
ng
the possibilities of intrauterine complications that the fetus can develop,
highlights Lower tolerance to acidosis, higher frequency of anomalous
presentations, risk of fetal trauma, risk of intracranial hemorrhage and ri=
sk
of sepsis. After birth, they may present difficulties in sucking, weight ga=
in,
temperature control, as well as respiratory problems.(27)
Given the above, monitoring the
fetus during labor becomes essential, as the constant verification of
physiological patterns can point out possible complications. From this cont=
ext,
the risk diagnosis of the disturbed mother-fetus binomial was listed, in or=
der
to perform care that safely met the needs of the mother and baby during lab=
or,
in an attempt to prevent other complications.
A study carried out in a hospita=
l in
the city of São Paulo observed that 52.1% of the parturients who went throu=
gh
the experience of a risky delivery reported concern for themselves and their
baby's health during the delivery process, mentioning anxiety resulting fro=
m a
danger. real, perceived or imaginary.(28)
In view of this, the diagnosis of anxiety was listed based on the rep=
ort
of the parturient's concern with the conditions of delivery, with care being
listed in order to promote comfort to the patient.
Based on this experience, it was
noticed through the application of the SNC, that the nurse participates ful=
ly
in the care provided to the parturient, which is extremely relevant, as it
allows organizing and directing the decision-making of the professional in =
the
face of the real needs of the woman. patient, collaborating for the promoti=
on,
prevention, recovery and rehabilitation of individual and collective health=
. In
addition, nurses have the possibility to strengthen bonds with the pregnant
woman, providing qualified, welcoming and holistic care=
.(29-31)
Observing the role of nurses
provided the academics with practical experiences in care during labor,
contributing to the acquisition of professional skills and competences, sin=
ce
the completion of internships during the Nursing undergraduate course provi=
des
the student with the opportunity to practice the content obtained from
theoretical form.(32) However, despite the significant experienc=
es
obtained during the internship with the implementation of the SNC, the stud=
ents
were not able to assess whether the expected results were satisfactorily
achieved, due to the short period of time that the academics remained in the
unit of health.
This study brought important res=
ults
to be discussed in the academic and professional scope. The findings show t=
hat
it is necessary to develop research that provide better subsidies for the w=
ork
of nurses, as well as indicating that the use of SNC enhances the quality of
care provided, especially in the face of an intercurrence such as PL, which
directly impacts the incidence of maternal morbidity and mortality. and
neonatal.
Thus, the results show that it is
necessary for nurses and the multiprofessional health team to have knowledg=
e on
the subject and be able to provide quality care in the face of PL. The
limitations of this study involve the difficulty of a prolonged follow-up of
the patient's clinical evolution until her discharge from hospital, due to =
the
rotation of academics in the internship field.
FINAL
CONSIDERATIONS
It is concluded that the study made it possible to discu=
ss
and expand the theoretical knowledge of academics about important obstetric
complications, such as PL. In this way, the experience made it possible for=
the
academics to improve their clinical reasoning skills necessary for the
elaboration of the SNC. The assistance provided also made it possible to re=
flect
on the nurse's practice regarding individualized patient care, favoring a
better view of the importance of working based on technical-scientific
knowledge.
The application of the SNC by academics provided the
expansion of their understanding of the relevance of a systematized care, b=
oth
in the care and management aspects, in order to obtain the best results for=
the
patient and also provide the optimization of the work of the nursing team.
Through the practical application of SNC, it was possible to provide quality
nursing care, which provided the patient with efficient, holistic and human=
ized
care.
REFERENCES
1 Ministério da Saúde (BR). Gest= ação de alto risco: manual técnico. 5ª ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012.<= o:p>
2 Ahumada-Barrios ME, Alvarado, =
GF.
Risk Factors for premature birth in a hospital. [Internet]. 2016; 24: e2750.
[acesso em 30 de jul 2020]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.0775.275=
0.
3 Rover MMS, Vieira CS, Toso BRG=
O,
Grassiolli S, Bugs BM. Growth of very low birth weight preterm until 12 mon=
ths
of corrected age. [Internet]. J Hum Growth Dev. 2015;25(3):351-6. [acesso e=
m 30
de jul 2020]. Disponível em:
4 Oliveira GC. Análise do catch-=
up
de crescimento de uma coorte de recém-nascidos prematuros [dissertação]. Cu=
iabá
(MT): Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso; 2015.
5 Rede Nacional Primeira Infânci=
a. O
custo da prematuridade para a saúde pública ultrapassa R$ 8 bilhões por ano=
no
país. [Internet]. 2019. [acesso em 30 de jul 2020]. Disponível em: <=
span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>http://primeirainfancia=
.org.br/o-custo-da-prematuridade-para-a-saude-publica-ultrapassa-r-8-bilhoe=
s-por-ano-no-pais/#:~:text=3DNo%20mundo%2C%20nascem%2015%20milh%C3%B5es,11%=
2C5%25%20dos%20nascimentos.
6 Bavaresco T, Menolli RA, Frizon
BJZ, Vierira CS, Conterno JR, Guimarães ATB et al. Hypertension and maternal
urinary tract infection and the metabolic conditions of preterm infants.
[Internet]. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019; 72(3):3-8.
[acesso em 30 de jul 2020].
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-017=
9.
7 Rezende J. Obstetrícia.
11ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Gua=
nabara
Koogan; 2017.
8 Pohlmann FC, Kerber NPC, Viana,
JS, Carvalho VF, Costa CC, Souza, CS. Premature birth<=
/span>: approaches presents in national
and international <=
span
class=3DSpellE>scientific production.
[Internet]. Enfermería Global. 2016; 42:398-409. [acesso em 30 de jul 2020].
Disponível em: http://sc=
ielo.isciii.es/pdf/eg/v15n42/en_revision1.pdf.
9 Souza
MF, Viana VC, Silva MC, Guimarães CCV, Cruz VOO., Aguiar BGC et al.
Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem ao trabalho de parto prematuro:=
Um
estudo de caso [Internet]. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2019; 5(12):
32974-32983. [acesso em 12 de out 2021]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.34117/=
bjdv5n12-353
10 Conselho Federal de Enfermagem
(BR). Resolução COFEN - 358/2009. Brasília; 2009.
11 Bulecheck GM et al. Nursing
Interventions classification (NIC). 6 ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2016.=
12 Moorhead S et al. Nursing
Outcomes Classification (NOC): Measurement of health outcomes. 5ª ed. Rio de
Janeiro: Elsevier; 2016.
13 North American Nursing Diagno=
sis
Association. Diagnósticos de enfermagem da NANDA: definições e classificaçõ=
es
2018-2020. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2018.
14 Ministério da Saúde (BR).
Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Di=
ário
Oficial da União; 2013.
15 Conselho Federal de Enfermagem
(BR). Código de Ética dos Profissionais de Enfermagem. Rio
de Janeiro, 2007.
16 Santos WN, Santos AMS, Lopes
TRPS, Madeira MZA, Rocha FCV. Systematization of nursing care: the historic=
al
context, the process and obstacles to deployment. [Internet]. J Manag Prim
Health Care. 2014;5(2):153-8. [acesso em 30 de jul 2020]. Disponível em: =
span>https://doi.org/10.14295/jmphc.v5i2.210.
17 Marinelli NP, Silva ARA, Silva
DNO. Sistematização da assistência de enfermagem: desafios para a implantaç=
ão.
[Internet]. Rev Enferm Contemporânea. 2016;4(2):254-63. [acesso em 30 de jul
2020]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.17267/2317-3378rec.v4i2=
.523.
18 Bittar RE, Carvalho MHB, Zuga=
ib
M. Condutas para o trabalho de parto prematuro. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet.
[Internet]. 2005;27(9): 561-6. [acesso em 30 de jul 2020]. Disponível em: <=
/span>http://dx=
.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032005000900010.
19 Oliveira RS, Brito MLS, Costa
Neto DB. Uma análise integral do trabalho de parto prematuro. [Internet]. <=
span
class=3DGramE>Revista de Pa=
tologia
do Tocantins. 2019; 6(1):54-57 [acesso em 30 de out 2020]. Disponível em: <=
/span>http://dx=
.doi.org/10.20873/uft.2446-6492.2019v6n1p54.
20 Silva RA, Sousa TA, Vitorino =
KA.
Infecção do trato urinário na gestação: diagnóstico e tratamento.
[Internet]. Rev Cient da Fac Educ =
e Meio
Ambiente. 2019;10(1):71-80. [acesso em 30 de jul 2020]. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.31072/rcf.v10iedesp.7=
65.
21 Esteves APVS, Gonçalves LBC,
Oliveira RBS, Gaya ST, Silva VF. Vaginose bacteriana associada ao parto
prematuro. [Internet]. Revista Cadernos de Medicina. 2019; 2(1):6-15. [aces=
so
em 30 de out 2020]. Disponível em:=
https://w=
ww.unifeso.edu.br/revista/index.php/cadernosdemedicinaunifeso/article/view/=
1038/571.
22 Reis SN, Souza LPS, Madeira LM, Azevedo VMGO. Conservati=
ve
Management of premature rupture of the fetal membrane of pregnant women in a
maternity ward of Minas Gerais, Brazil. [Internet]. Brazilian Journal of He=
alth
Review. 2019: 2 (4):3104-3119. [acesso em 30 de out 2020]. Disponível em: <=
/span>https://w=
ww.brazilianjournals.com/index.php/BJHR/article/view/2116/2132=
span>.
23 Duarte MMP, Freire EEG, Olive=
ira
JFB. Assistência de Enfermagem à gestante em trabalho de parto prematuro. [=
Internet].
Revista Interfaces: Saúde, Humanas e Tecnologia. 2015;3(1):1-8. [acesso em =
30
de jul 2020]. Disponível em: http://dx=
.doi.org/10.16891/2317.434X.143.
24 Campos VS, Morais AC, Araújo =
PO,
Morais AC, Almeida BS, Silva JS. (2020). Puerperal experience with normal l=
abor
pain. [Internet]. Revista Eletrônica Acervo Saúde. 2020; (40): e2396. [aces=
so
em 30 de out 2020]. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.25248/reas.e2396.2020=
.
25 Firmino KC, Lima EP, Correia =
TRL,
Silva JCB, Albuquerque NLA. Percepção da mulher frente à dor do parto.
[Internet]. Revista Ciência Plural. 2020; 6(1): 87-101. [acesso em 30 de jul
2020]. Disponível em: https://d=
oi.org/10.21680/2446-7286.2020v6n1ID18387.
26 Holzbach LC, Moreira RADM,
Pereira RJ. Quality indicators in nutritional therapy of preterm newborns
admitted to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. [Internet]. Nutrición clínica y
dietética hospitalaria. 2018; 38(4): 39-48. [acesso em 30 de jul 2020].
Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.12873/384junqueira.
27 Oliveira RPC, Rocha MNS.
Protocolo de prematuridade. Bahia: Maternidade Climério de Oliveira.
[Internet]; 2016. [acesso em 30 de jul 2020]. Disponível em: http://ww=
w2.ebserh.gov.br/documents/215335/4407336/Protocolo+Prematuridade.pdf/c17c2=
f08-ee68-4855-aadc-1aa41b4adcf0.
28 Gouveia HG. Diagnósticos de
enfermagem e problemas colaborativos mais comuns na gestação de risco [diss=
ertação].
Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas;
2001.
29 Fraga TF, Matos E, Costa R, S=
alum
NC, Maliska ICA. The nursing process in an obstetric center: perspective of
nurses. [Internet]. Texto contexto enferm. 2018; 27(3):e4600016. [acesso em=
01
ago 2020]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-0707201800046=
00016.
30 Carvalho CA, Santos ZMSA, Fro=
ta
MA, Aguiar ACT, Santos PDS, Cavalcante LFD et al. Experiências vivenciadas =
pelo
enfermeiro assistencial com o processo de enfermagem. [Internet]. Atas -
Investigação Qualitativa em Saúde. 2016. [acesso em 30 de out 2020]. Dispon=
ível
em: https://p=
roceedings.ciaiq.org/index.php/ciaiq2016/article/view/1079.
31 Adamy
EK, Zocche DAA, Almeida MA. Contribution of the
nursing process for the construction of the identity of nursing professiona=
ls.
[Internet]. Rev. Gaúcha Enferm. 2020; 41(spe): e20190143. [acesso em 11 de =
ago
2020]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2020.201=
90143.
32 Silva LM, Santana TCP, Silva
LRFG, Rocha LM, Canhoto CTS, Dantas KL, et. al. Estágio curricular supervisionado: dificuldades e perspectivas
vivenciadas por acadêmicos de enfermagem. [Internet]. Revista Eletrônica Ac=
ervo
Saúde. 2019; (18):662-662 [acesso em 01 de ago 2020]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.25248/reas.e662.2019
Submissiom: 2021-11-10
Approval: 2022-01-19