ELEMENTOS DIRECIONADORES DO PARTO DOMICILIAR PLANEJADO: REVISÃO DE ESCOPO

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31011/reaid-2024-v.98-n.4-art.2109

Palavras-chave:

Mulheres, Gestantes, Parto, Entorno do Parto, Parto domiciliar

Resumo

Introdução: As práticas de parto no Brasil sofreram grandes transformações ao longo dos anos, com um alto processo de medicalização incluído, principalmente em meados do século XX. Desse modo, percebe-se a necessidade de compreender quais os elementos que compõem a decisão da mulher no direcionamento da escolha para o parto domiciliar planejado. Objetivo: Analisar os elementos que conduzem as gestantes na escolha pelo parto domiciliar planejado. Método: Revisão de literatura do tipo Scoping Review, realizado a partir de busca em maio de 2023 no Portal de Periódicos CAPES, nas bases: MEDLINE, CINAHL e SCOPUS, com a utilização dos descritores “normal delivery”, “natural delivery”, “homebirth”, “free birth”, “unassisted home birth” e dos operadores booleanos and e or. Resultados: Os trinta e dois estudos incluídos nesta pesquisa, evidenciaram a descredibilização da mulher no processo de parto hospitalar, e a possibilidade de ser sujeito ativo no seu processo de parto. Conclusão:  Os elementos que conduzem as gestantes na escolha e preferência pelo parto domiciliar planejado decorrem da descredibilização da parturiente no processo de parto/nascimento no hospital vivenciado ou percebido e da possibilidade de Ser sujeito ativo no processo de parto/nascimento no PDP.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Mayrla Vitória Dunga Maia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba

Enfermeira pela Universidade Federal da Paraíba. João Pessoa, Paraíba. 

Jaqueline Queiroz de Macedo, Universidade Federal da Paraíba

Enfermeira. Doutora em Enfermagem. Professora do Curso de Graduação em Enfermagem da Universidade Federal da Paraíba. João Pessoa. Paraíba. E-mail: jaquelineqmac@gmail.com. ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1330-3460.

Carla Braz Evangelista, Universitário de João Pessoa - UNIPÊ

Enfermeira. Doutora em Enfermagem. Professora do Curso de Graduação em Enfermagem do Centro Universitário de João Pessoa. João Pessoa, Paraíba. E-mail: carlabrazevangelista@gmail.com.

 

Referências

Menezes P, Portella S, Bispo T. A situação do parto domiciliar no Brasil. Rev Enferm. Contemp [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2023 Aug 8];1(1):3-43. Available from: https://www5.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/38 doi: https://doi.org/10.17267/2317-3378rec.v1i1.38

Kruno RB, Silva TO, Trindade PTO. A vivência de mulheres no parto domiciliar planejado. Saúde [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Aug 8];43(1):22-30. Available from: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/revistasaude/article/view/17736 doi: https://doi.org/10.5902/2236583417736

Matos GC, Escobal AP, Soares MC, Härter J, Gonzales RIC. A trajetória histórica das políticas de atenção ao parto: uma revisão integrativa. Rev enferm UFPE on line [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Sept 13];7(Spec No):870-8. Available from: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/11552/13486 doi: https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963-v7i3a11552p870-878-2013

Suárez-Cortés M, Armero-Barranco D, Canteras-Jordana M, Martínez-Roche ME. Use and influence of delivery and birth plans in the humanizing delivery process. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Sept 13];23(3):520-6. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/rlae/a/CnCH3f9JjpyCsCStbtdrZfS/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0067.2583

Leal MC, Theme-Filha MM, Moura EC, Cecatti JG, Santos LMP. Atenção ao pré-natal e parto em mulheres usuárias do sistema público de saúde residentes na Amazônia Legal e no Nordeste, Brasil 2010. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Sept 13];15(1):91-104. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbsmi/a/9zxhRbM8GHHz9pJWr59GZTJ/abstract/?lang=pt doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292015000100008

Bettiol H, Barbieri M, Silva A. Epidemiologia do nascimento pré-termo: tendências atuais. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2023 Sept 13];32(2):57-60. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/rbgo/a/PgpHgqRx8WjDt8NLtgDYm8S/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032010000200001

Magalhães AG, Souza FMLC. Me preparando para o parto e nascimento: orientações sobre a gestação, parto e pós-parto. Santa Cruz: UFRN/FACISA; 2021.

Cursino T, Benincasa M. Parto domiciliar planejado no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática nacional. Cien Saude Colet [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Oct 20];25(4):1433-44. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/csc/a/PHwbP7cr6w4bSczKPgBH7pw/?lang=pt doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020254.13582018

Colacioppo PM, Koiffman MD, Riesco MLG, Schneck CA, Osava RH. Parto domiciliar planejado: resultados maternos e neonatais. Referência [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2023 Oct 20];3(2):81-90. Available from: https://repositorio.usp.br/item/002152334 doi: https://doi.org/10.12707/RII0932

Koettker JG, Brüggemann OM, Knobel R. Resultados maternos dos partos domiciliares planejados assistidos por enfermeiras da equipe Hanami no Sul do Brasil, 2002-2012. Texto & contexto enferm [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Oct 20];26(1):e3110015. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/tce/a/JC9Vqys94N3tpwyVGY46vhy/?lang=en doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017003110015

Leite T, Marques ES, Esteves-Pereira AP, Nucci MF, Portella Y, Leal MC. Desrespeitos e abusos, maus tratos e violência obstétrica: um desafio para a epidemiologia e a saúde pública no Brasil. Cien Saude Colet [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Oct 10];27(2):483-91. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/csc/a/vWq9rQQg8B8GhcTb3xZ9Lsj/?lang=pt doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232022272.38592020

Vargens O, Alehagen S, Silva A. Desejando parir naturalmente: perspectiva de mulheres sobre o parto domiciliar planejado com uma enfermeira obstétrica. Rev Enferm UERJ [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Sept 20];29:e56113. Available from: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/enfermagemuerj/article/view/56113/38560 doi: https://doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2021.56113

Pascoto GS, Tanaka EZ, Fernandes LCR, Shimo AKK, Sanfelice CFO. Dificuldades da assistência ao parto domiciliar na ótica de enfermeiras obstetras. Rev Baiana Enferm [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Sept 20];34:e36633. Available from: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/enfermagem/article/view/36633 doi: https://doi.org/10.18471/rbe.v34.36633

Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for evidence synthesis [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2020 [cited 2023 Sept 20]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. doi: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-01

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Sept 20];169(7):467-73. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30178033/ doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Bardin L. Análise de Conteúdo São Paulo: Edições 70; 2016.

Bedford J, Gandhi M, Admassu M, Girma A. ‘A Normal Delivery Takes Place at Home’: a qualitative study of the location of childbirth in Rural Ethiopia. Matern Child Health J [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Sept 22];17(2):230-9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22359241/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-0965-3

Stoliar S, Dahlen H, Sheehan A. A national survey of Australian midwives’ birth choices and outcomes. Women Birth [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Sept 30]; 36(2): e246-e253. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35927213/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.07.173

Rigg EC, Schmied V, Peters K, Dahlen HG. A survey of women in Australia who choose the care of unregulated birthworkers for a birth at home. Women Birth [Internet]. 2020 Feb [cited 2023 Sept 22];33(1):86-96. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30503223/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.11.007

Greenfield M, Payne-Gifford S, McKenzie G. Between a rock and a hard place: considering “freebirth” during covid-19. Fron Glob Womens Health [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Sept 22];2:1-11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34816178/ doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2021.603744

Araújo BRO, Trezza MCSF, Santos RM, Oliveira LLF, Pinto LMTR. Entre ritos y contextos: Resoluciones y significados atribuidos al parto natural humanizado. Cult Cuid [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Sept 30];23(54): 206-16. Available from: https://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/96331 doi: https://doi.org/10.14198/cuid.2019.54.18

Jackson M, Schmied V, Dahlen H. Birthing outside the system: the motivation behind the choice to freebirth or have a homebirth with risk factors in Australia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Sept 30];20(254):1-13. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32345236/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02944-6

Lee S, Ayers S, Holden D. Decision-making regarding place of birth in high-risk pregnancy: a qualitative study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Sept 30]; 37(2):44-50. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/0167482X.2016.1151413 doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2016.1151413

Macdonald D, Etowa J, Helwig M. Experiences of women who have planned unassisted home births: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Sept 27];17(1):16-21. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30204708/ doi: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003654

Treacy L, Sagbakken M. Exploration of perceptions and decision-making processes related to childbirth in rural Sierra Leone. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Sept 27];15(87):1-12. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25886036/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0500-9

Feeley C. Freebirthing: a case for using interpretative hermeneutic phenomenology in midwifery research for knowledge generation, dissemination and impact. J Res Nurs [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Sept 27]; 24(1-2):9-19. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1744987118809450 doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987118809450

Kouanda S, Bado A, Meda IB, Yameogo GS, Coulibaly A, Haddad S. Home births in the context of free health care: the case of Kaya health district in Burkina Faso. Int J Gynaecol Obstet [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Sept 27];135(1 Suppl):39-44. Available from: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.009 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.009

Volpato F, Costa R, Brüggemann OM, Monguilhott JJC, Gomes IEM, Colossi L. Information that (de)motivate women’s decision-making for planned home birth. Rev Bras Enferm [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Sept 27];74(4):e20200404. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/reben/a/XqwxZS34ppmNWjspynVTt7d/?lang=en doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0404

Sperlich M, Gabriel C. “I got to catch my own baby”: a qualitative study of out of hospital birth. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Sept 22];19(43):1-13. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35164785/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01355-4

Baranowska B, Węgrzynowska M, Tataj-Puzyna U, Crowther S. “I knew there has to be a better way”: women’s pathways to freebirth in Poland. Women Birth [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Sept 30]; 35(4):e328-e336. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34364823/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.07.008

Lokugamage A. In pursuit of the benefits of physiological birth. Midwifery Today Int Midwife [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2023 Sept 30];(108):38-41. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24511839/

Greenfield M, Jomeen J, Glover L. “It can’t be like last time”: choices made in early pregnancy by women who have previously experienced a traumatic birth. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Sept 30];10:1-13. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6355667/ doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00056

Scarf VL, Viney R, Yu S, Foureur M, Rossiter C, Dahlen H, et al. Mapping the trajectories for women and their babies from births planned at home, in a birth centre or in a hospital in New South Wales, Australia, between 2000 and 2012. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Sept 30];19(1):513. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31864317/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2584-0

Gildner T, Thayer Z. Maternity care preferences for future pregnancies among United States childbearers: the impacts of covid-19. Front Sociol [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Sept 30];6:611407. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8022446/ doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.611407

Henriksen L, Nordström M, Nordheim I, Lundgren I, Blix E. Norwegian women’s motivations and preparations for freebirth - a qualitative study. Sex Reprod Healthc [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Sept 22];25:100511. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1877575619304276?via%3Dihub doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100511

Mortazavi F, Mehrabadi M. Predictors of fear of childbirth and normal vaginal birth among Iranian postpartum women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2021 Apr [cited 2023 Sept 28];21(1):316. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33882872/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03790-w

Ahmed M, Demissie M, Worku A, Abrha A, Berhane Y. Socio-cultural factors favoring home delivery in Afar pastoral community, Northeast Ethiopia: a qualitative study. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 sept 27];16(171):1-9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31752897/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-083

Lindgren H, Nassen K, Lundgren I. Taking the matter into one’s own hands – women’s experiences of unassisted homebirths in Sweden. Sex Reprod Healthc [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Sept 27];11:31-35. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28159125/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2016.09.005

Sweet L, Wynter K, O'Driscoll K, Blums T, Nenke A, Sommeling M, et al. Ten years of a publicly funded homebirth service in Victoria: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Sept 28];62(5):664-673. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35318640/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13518

Feeley C, Thomson G. Tensions and conflicts in ‘choice’: Womens’ experiences of freebirthing in the UK. Midwifery [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Sept 28];41:16-21. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27498184/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.014

McKenzie G, Montgomery E. Undisturbed physiological birth: insights from women who freebirth in the United Kingdom. Midwifery [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Sept 27];101:103042. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34130194/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103042

Vargens OMC, Alehagen S, Silva ACV. Wanting to give birth naturally: women’s perspective on planned homebirth with a nurse midwife. Rev Enferm UERJ [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Sept 27]; 29:e56113. Available from: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1224567 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/reuerj.2021.56113

Feeley C, Thomson G. Why do some women choose to freebirth in the UK? An interpretative phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Sept 22];16(59):1-12. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27000100/ doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12884-016-0847-6

Rigg EC, Schmied V, Peters, K, Dahlen HG. Why do women choose an unregulated birth worker to birth at home in Australia: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Sept 22];17(99):1-14. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28351344/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1281-0

Sassine H, Burns E, Ormsby S, Dahlen HG. Why do women choose homebirth in Australia? A national survey. Women Birth [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Sept 27];34(4):396-404. Available from:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32636161/. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.06.005

Lou S, Dahlen HG, Hansen SG, Rodkjær LØ, Maimburg RD. Why freebirth in a maternity system with free midwifery care? A qualitative study of Danish women’s motivations and preparations for freebirth. Sex Reprod Healthc [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Sept 27]; 34:100789. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36332498/ doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100789

Ahmad Tajuddin NAN, Suhaimi J, Ramdzan SN, Malek KA, Ismail IA, Shamsuddin NH, et al. Why women chose unassisted home birth in Malaysia: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Sept 22];20(309):1-12. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32429857/doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12884-020-02987-9

Liu Y, Li T, Guo N, Jiang H, Li Y, Xu C, et al. Women’s experience and satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care: a crosssectional survey in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Sept 22];21(1):151. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33607963/ doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03638-3

Publicado

08-11-2024

Como Citar

1.
Dunga Maia MV, Queiroz de Macedo J, Braz Evangelista C. ELEMENTOS DIRECIONADORES DO PARTO DOMICILIAR PLANEJADO: REVISÃO DE ESCOPO. Rev. Enferm. Atual In Derme [Internet]. 8º de novembro de 2024 [citado 25º de novembro de 2024];98(4):e024418. Disponível em: https://mail.revistaenfermagematual.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/2109

Edição

Seção

REVISÃO DE ESCOPO